<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Археологія, 2023, № 2</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199356" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199356</id>
<updated>2026-04-24T13:37:31Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T13:37:31Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>До 70-річчя Любомира Павловича Михайлини</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199553" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199553</id>
<updated>2024-10-15T13:30:28Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">До 70-річчя Любомира Павловича Михайлини
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Адам Кіркор: відкриття та перші дослідження трипільських памʼяток в Україні на Придністер'ї</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199552" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Яковишина, Я.М.</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199552</id>
<updated>2024-10-15T13:30:19Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Адам Кіркор: відкриття та перші дослідження трипільських памʼяток в Україні на Придністер'ї
Яковишина, Я.М.
Статтю присвячено історії відкриття та дослідження перших трипільських пам’яток на&#13;
Придністер’ї, які здійснив археолог А. Кіркор. Представлено їх сучасну інтерпретацію.; It is well known that the Trypillia culture in Ukraine was singled out by Vincenc Chvojka (Vikentii Khvoika — in Ukrainian)&#13;
based on his research in the Dnipro region at the end of the 19th century. However, a little earlier, the same sites were studied&#13;
in Eastern Galicia, Dnister region, by Polish researchers: Adam Kirkor, Izydor Kopernicki, Władysław Przybysławski, and&#13;
Gotfryd Ossowski. The territory, where Trypillian settlements were discovered, at that time, belonged to two empires — Russian&#13;
and Austro-Hungarian, so the culture had different names in the Dnipro region and the Dnister region. In Galicia, they became&#13;
known under the name of the Painted Pottery culture, whereas the sites in the Dnipro valley were called the Trypillia culture by&#13;
V. Chvojka. Nowadays it is a cultural and historical community of Cucuteni-Trypillia culture.&#13;
The first reports of the Trypillian antiquities discovery are dated to the 1820s, but full-fledged research had began in 1876 by&#13;
the Krakow archaeologist Adam Kirkor. For five seasons (1876—1878, 1881, 1882), the researcher had been studying rocky and&#13;
cave sites of the Dnister region; he collected fossils and fossil remains of animals. Adam had excavated the burials of the Globular&#13;
Amphora culture and initiated the excavations of the barrows of the Early Scythian period in the Middle Dnister region. During&#13;
the exploration, he examined several Trypillian settlements (Vasylkivtsi, Verkhniakivtsi, Horodnytsia, Zhabyntsi, Kozachchyna,&#13;
Lychkivtsi, Lanivtsi, Sukhostav, Yabluniv) and the Verteba cave near Bilche-Zolote village. The researcher managed to record&#13;
the positioning of the Trypillian dwellings’ remains in circles and straight lines. A. Kirkor interpreted these settlements as a&#13;
burnt Pagan burial ground. The first Trypillia sites discovered in the Dnister region were associated with the periphery of ancient&#13;
civilisation and the squares were interpreted as burnt cemeteries, which was a tribute to the scientific trends of that time. Such&#13;
opinions are not surprising and are explained by the fact that the researchers encountered the Trypillian antiquities for the first&#13;
time, and the ideas about their dating and purpose were quite conventional. The scholar had taken the materials he excavated&#13;
during the trips, to Krakow. Today, these finds are kept in the Archaeological Museum of Krakow.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Скляні чаші з оплавленим краєм вінець у черняхівській культурі: проблема походження</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199551" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Щепаченко, В.І.</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199551</id>
<updated>2024-10-15T13:30:09Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Скляні чаші з оплавленим краєм вінець у черняхівській культурі: проблема походження
Щепаченко, В.І.
Статтю присвячено вивченню проблеми походження однієї з груп черняхівського скляного посуду — чаш із оплавленим краєм вінець. Метою дослідження є пошук імовірних центрів, що можуть&#13;
претендувати на роль місця виготовлення таких&#13;
виробів, у межах доступної сьогодні інформації про&#13;
розвиток склоробного ремесла в черняхівській культурі та сусідніх римських провінціях.; In the article a research devoted to the problem of origin of hemispherical glass cups with fire-rounded rims discovered within the&#13;
Cherniakhiv culture area is presented. These finds may be compared to a certain extent to Western European vessels of Eggers&#13;
199, 202, 205-206 types or the so-called Bodenrippenschale and Faßschale (after G. Rau) as well as cups of Werbkowice and&#13;
Weklice types according to T. Stawiarska. Although, the Cherniakhiv artefacts are quite diverse in terms of their ornamental&#13;
design, they are very similar referring to their morphology as well as finishing and decoration techniques. This fact, besides their&#13;
identical chronological position and the same distribution pattern allow considering the mentioned items as a single glassware&#13;
group and assuming their common origin.&#13;
The conducted investigation demonstrates that at the end of the late Roman time (stage C3) the Cherniakhiv glass cups with&#13;
fire-rounded rims were an original typological group of vessels, which had no synchronous analogues outside their distribution&#13;
area. Although, the products that are similar to them in the technological point of view, occurred earlier in European Barbaricum,&#13;
Roman provinces and antique centres of the Northern Black Sea region as well as at the end of the late Roman time in the&#13;
Crimea. Taking into account the typological uniqueness and chronology of the Cherniakhiv finds as well as the absence of similar&#13;
glassware among the products of synchronous glass-making centres of the neighbouring Roman provinces, it can be assumed&#13;
that the most likely place of their origin was the Komariv workshop. The glass cups with fire-rounded rims are considered one&#13;
of the items produced in this workshop. The artefacts that have close parallels among Cherniakhiv cups are also known here. It&#13;
is worth noting, that the geochemical composition of some Cherniakhiv items finds close analogues between raw material and&#13;
glassworking waste from Komariv, which is further evidence in favour of this hypothesis.&#13;
The Roman origin of the Cherniakhiv cups, due to their morphological difference and chronological asynchrony with&#13;
technologically similar products of the Roman glass-working centers, seems unlikely to us. Nevertheless, despite certain&#13;
morphological differences, some early types of Western and Northern European artefacts, as well as Roman provincial glassware&#13;
could serve as prototypes for the Cherniakhiv finds.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Фотонегативи давньоєгипетської збірки Центрального Історичного Музею ім. Т. Г. Шевченка: Рецензія на монографію Романової О. О. і Станіциної Г. О. "Стародавній Єгипет у Києві: відображення на склі (колекція скляних фотонегативів Наукового архіву Інституту археології НАН України)". Київ, 2021</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199550" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Себта, Т.М.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Тарасенко, М.О.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Сорокіна, С.А.</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/199550</id>
<updated>2024-10-15T13:29:51Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Фотонегативи давньоєгипетської збірки Центрального Історичного Музею ім. Т. Г. Шевченка: Рецензія на монографію Романової О. О. і Станіциної Г. О. "Стародавній Єгипет у Києві: відображення на склі (колекція скляних фотонегативів Наукового архіву Інституту археології НАН України)". Київ, 2021
Себта, Т.М.; Тарасенко, М.О.; Сорокіна, С.А.
Стаття-рецензія спростовує висновки монографії-каталога О. О. Романової і Г. О. Станиціної&#13;
стосовно виникнення та походження збірки скляних негативів із зображеннями давньоєгипетських&#13;
пам’яток у Науковому архіві Інституту археології&#13;
НАН України, уточнює й доповнює визначення окремих пам’яток. Рецензенти доводять, що негативи,&#13;
як і зображені на них єгипетські старожитності,&#13;
походили з довоєнного зібрання Центрального історичного музею ім. Т. Г. Шевченка (нині Національний музей історії України).; The article reviews the monograph-catalogue O. O. Romanova and H. O. Stanytsina Ancient Egypt in Kyiv: mirrored on Glass&#13;
(the Glass Photonegatives Collection of the Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences&#13;
of Ukraine). This book is dedicated to the introduction into academic circulation of a collection of glass photonegatives depicting&#13;
ancient Egyptian objects from the Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of&#13;
Ukraine. 143 negatives and photographs of ancient Egyptian items were collected; they were published and provided with catalogue&#13;
data and comments. Significant work has been done on the attribution of objects depicted on the negatives. Noting the importance&#13;
of visual material introduced, the research part of the monograph, however, contains significant intentional or unintentional lacunae&#13;
regarding the existing base of Ukrainian researches on the topic. The Egyptological part of the work has also a certain number of&#13;
completely or partially erroneous attributions and statements and ignores existing academic publications on the subject.&#13;
The reviewers came to somewhat different conclusions regarding the reason for the formation of the discussed collection of&#13;
negatives, specified the circumstances, time and place of their creation, differently defined individual ancient Egyptian objects&#13;
and the provenance of some of them (for example, the “shabti-box” on the photonegatives (now lost) is actually a canopic box).&#13;
Documents from the Scientific Archive of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine are of great importance for revising&#13;
the conclusions of the monograph. An excerpt from the inventory book of negatives is published, which demonstrates that the&#13;
collection was created at the Taras Shevchenko National Historical Museum in the process of preparing an exhibition of ancient&#13;
Egyptian artefacts.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
