<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Соціум. Альманах соціальної історії, 2006, вип. 6</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/103685" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/103685</id>
<updated>2026-04-19T03:24:49Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-19T03:24:49Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>В ім'я милої вітчизни: вірність та зрада Івана Мазепи</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/104050" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Плохій, С.</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/104050</id>
<updated>2016-07-01T00:02:09Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">В ім'я милої вітчизни: вірність та зрада Івана Мазепи
Плохій, С.
The author studies the transformation of the concept of «motherland» in the community of the Cossacks elite of the second half of the 17th - early 18th century: starting from the traditional for the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth view on motherland as «Old Ruthenia» up to identifying it as the Hetmanate. Therefore&#13;
the author claims that the concept of «motherland» was basic for the attempts both to legitimize and to discredit Mazepa's uprising against the tsar in 1708.&#13;
&#13;
Mazepa and his supporters explained their uprising by their agitation for motherland's integrity and welfare, as the attempt to liberate it from foreign yoke. There were Mazepa's speeches and manifests that had introduces the concept of motherland as highest value and the object of fidelity. Due to this rhetoric, Peter I, speaking primarily about Mazepa's treason of the tsar himself, later turned to speak about his treason of motherland. On the contrary, the tsar trayed to present his actions as the defense of «Little Russians nation» against it's enemies, that were moved by personal ambitions and the intention to enrich theirselve. It is important, that, addressing to his «Little Russian» subjects, Peter I speaks about «their» (not «our») motherland; on the contrary pronoun «our» is widely used by the representatives of the Church and civil elites of the Hetmanate.&#13;
&#13;
The author also describes the appearance of the concept of Russian monarchy (thanks to Theophan Prokopovych) as common motherland and object of fidelity of all the subjects of the tsar, and analyses its controversial representation in Hrabianka and Velychko discourses. Finally, the author notes, that in the drama «Grace of God», presented by students of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy to honor the restoration of the Hetmanate, the concept of motherland equals Ukraine, or Little Russia, not Russia. This demonstrates that the tradition of Mazepa and Orlyk dominated in the Hetmanate over the tradition of Prokopovych.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Уявлення про "зраду" у трактаті Іннокентія Гізеля "Мир з Богом чоловіку"</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/104049" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Довга, Л.</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/104049</id>
<updated>2016-07-01T00:02:21Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Уявлення про "зраду" у трактаті Іннокентія Гізеля "Мир з Богом чоловіку"
Довга, Л.
The author focuses on views of I. Gizel about «treason» in the context of traditions of Christian divinity. It is mentioned that every sin was treated by Gizel under this concept because ability to the sin was violation of loyalty to God and his commandments. However, the author believes that in more narrow definition of concept «treason» Gizel pushed off from realities of daily occurrence, in particular, from judicial practice of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Legal approach, selected by him for the analysis of sin as a crime accomplished against God, justice, absolute law, and common blessing, resulted in that «treason» is exposed not so much through the prism of moral estimation of act, as from the point of view of a danger which it can represent for political stability or consent in given community. Righorism traditional for Orthodox ethics in relation to estimation of human acts is transferable on an attempt to co-ordinate strict moral principles of the Church with the terms of the real earthly life of laymen.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Зрада королю чи законне право на виступ? (Козацьке повстання першої половини 1648 року у сприйнятті Вйська Запорозького)</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/104048" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Степанков, В.</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/104048</id>
<updated>2016-07-01T00:02:05Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Зрада королю чи законне право на виступ? (Козацьке повстання першої половини 1648 року у сприйнятті Вйська Запорозького)
Степанков, В.
The article addresses the problem of the leaders of the Zaporozhian Host proving the legitimacy of the revolutionary outburst of 1648. Attention is paid to the Cossacks' increasing social and political awareness during 1630s, realizing there rights as knights and gaining functions of the «political nation». The author contradicts attempts at depicting the Cossacks as a military society, identical to mercenaries with all their wicked traits. The author supports the idea of all the participants of the outburst regarding their actions as fully legitimate, as they were not only defending their class privileges, but also the rights and freedoms the King granted the Ruthenian nation and the Orthodox Church.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Potworne konspiracje, czyli prob lem zdrady w Rzeczypospolitey w czasach wazow</title>
<link href="http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/104047" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Augustyniak, U.</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua:80/handle/123456789/104047</id>
<updated>2016-07-01T00:02:06Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Potworne konspiracje, czyli prob lem zdrady w Rzeczypospolitey w czasach wazow
Augustyniak, U.
The 16th - 17th century Europe was a scene of religious wars and magnates rebellions against monarchy. In this time of «universal conspiracy» treason was treated as normal tool for political activity of elites. However, the analysis of sources (private and official correspondence, resolutions and constitutions of Diets etc.) leads us to conclusion that in the 16th century treason was regarded in Poland as something dishonorable, something suitable for plebeians and foreigners only.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
